The Real Enemy of Europe
In the former chapters I have tried to show that Germany is engaged in building
up a state on new and original lines which is entirely her own affair, whether we
like it or not, has no aggressive designs on any other country and wishes to be left
alone to develop her internal economy and external trade. She is also quite
willing to continue to pay the salaries of Protestant Pastors and Roman Catholic
Priests on condition that they leave politics alone and do not use the pulpit to
attack the Government.
This being her policy there seems no reason why other Nations and other
ideologies should not have left her alone. She is, it is true, strongly armed but so
are her neighbours and they began it.
After the threat of war by both France and Great Britain over the Sudeten German
question, which was not the business of either of us, she naturally fortified her
French frontier, an essential net of defence. As far as we are concerned as we had
fallen far below the standard of other countries it was in an uncertain world, but it
is obvious that these armaments are not directed against Germany unless our
intention is a war of aggression. Nor is Germany arming against us. She has no
cause of quarrel with us and no reason to believe that as long as we have a
responsible Government in spite of the continued attacks in our Press and by
certain politicians, that she has any reason to fear hostility on our part. She is not
looking towards France and England but is looking across the plains of Poland at
a much more dangerous enemy. The Soviet with 2,000,000 men on a Peace
footing under arms, spent last year £ 1,000 millions on additional
armaments and has behind her an unlimited supply of man power in Asia.
On the contrary while showing occasional nervousness at our expenditure on
armaments, which if a popular front coalition came into power would be directed
against her, she realises that all the armed forces of Germany, France, Italy and
England may be needed to rescue Europe from an Asiatic invasion more
formidable than any of the invasions of the past.
I myself share her confidence in our peaceful intention.
To-day Germany is no longer anxious to keep a watch on the Rhine, but on the
Dneiper. The suggestions therefore of a mutual reduction of armaments between
France, England and Germany are now out of date though at one time Germany
would have considered them. She would rather say keep up your bombing plots
and your munitions. They may all be needed to defend European civilisation from
going down in a hideous massacre.
It is extraordinary how we shut our eyes to this danger with the horrible example
of Spain before us. How we talk about the help given to Franco by Germany and
Italy but ignore the help given to the Red Government by the Soviet. While the
Nazi form of Government is, as Hitler has said again and again, intended for
home consumption, Communism is international and is carrying on an
underground agitation throughout the world, and insinuating itself into society
and other organisations under various plausible names and disguises, having at its
disposal the most formidable secret society in the world, continental Free
Masonry, which is a very different affair to our amiable Free Masonry over here,
and is revolutionary
and anti-Christian.
The centre of the Comintern is Moscow and the Soviet Government gave
themselves away when they broke of diplomatic relations with Hungary because
she joined
the anti-Comintern pact.
One of the cleverest lies put forth by the Communists and accepted over here, is
that
the anti-Comintern pact is directed against Democracy. It is true Germany resents
the continued attacks made upon her in the name of Democracy and occasionally
shows up the claims of Democracy to be the one perfect political system, but she
has no desire to attack or replace Democracy in any Democratic country by
another system. To each country the Government it prefers, is her motto. It is true
that there is Nazi agitation in some European countries, because throughout the
world many people have been convinced in favour of a Nazi State, but such
agitation is not encouraged by the German Government.
Communism is an international movement organising revolution in every country,
and it has now been clearly demonstrated that the hideous massacres in Spain of
Priests, Monks and Nuns, and the burning of Churches was connived at by the
Government of the adventurers in Madrid made up of adventurers who had seized
power.
The sustained attack on the German Government and the propagation of lie upon
lie through our Press and by means of an endless stream of publications is to be
traced back to Communist propaganda.
While active Communist agitation has made little progress in this country, India
and Burmah are rotten with Communism and Communism is wishing to set the
four Powers at each other's throats. Whenever a step has been made towards
agreement it swings back again, through a poisonous propaganda in which the
British Press leads.
Certain enmity to Germany is therefore to be expected on the part of Socialists,
Extreme Protestants and the Roman Catholic Church. Germany has also another
enemy - International Finance, because she will not borrow money outside but is
holding up an economic system in which there is no room for the international
financier.
If she would only borrow £ 100,000,000 in the City all our Press would
coo like sucking doves and our friendship or hostility to the new Spanish
Government will depend on whether she consults the City for money.
All the different sources of hostility are at work, but they do not account for the
persistent agitation on which large sums of money are being spent, an agitation
for a deliberate purpose, a war in which the four Capitalist States will destroy
each other so that a Communist state will be built on the ruins, and the one
organised source of this persistent agitation is the Comintern with ample funds
behind it in Moscow.
The Japanese war in China is not directed against the independence of China or
for the possession of territory. It is war against the Soviet. The complete control
of the Soviet over Czechoslovakia has been amply proved. When Hitler said he
would if compelled fight his way into Sudeten Germany it was not only to free the
Sudeten Germans but to close the open door into Europe for the Soviet armies. As
I have already pointed out if we had been so rash as to plunge Europe into war on
that question and invite the assistance of the Soviet, Europe would have been
doomed. In the strategic position of the mountains of Poland, the guns are now
pointed not towards Germany but towards Russia. Hungary in past centuries
fought bravely against Asiatic invasion holding the strategic position where the
Danube turns abruptly to the east. We cannot trust the Slavonic peoples because
of their racial affinity and Benes did his best to organise them against
Germany.
If Spain had turned red and we had supported Benes against Germany, the day
might already have arrived for which the Soviet is waiting. Everyone who
however innocently helps the agitation against Germany is playing for war and
the triumph of Communism.
Communism versus National
Socialism
I have already dealt with the dangerous war propaganda of the Labour Party in
this country supported by politicians who do not belong to the Party, but it is
necessary to look a little deeper into this matter.
The word Socialism is used with so many different meanings that it is necessary
before writing these observations to define in which sense it is used in Germany.
The broadest definition is the conception of a State which is a living organic
whole, in which the members of the State are inspired and guided by the duty of
service to the State as paramount.
That is the meaning given to the word by the German to-day when he describes
the German State as a National Socialist State.
The meaning attached to the word by the Communists and the members of our
Labour Party who are followers of the Jew Karl Marx, is quite different. By
Socialism they mean the ownership of all Capital and administration of
production, distribution and exchange by the State, and the elimination of the
producer and trader for private profit. The Communist differs from the official
Labour Party Leaders, not in his aim but in his method, which is certainly
somewhat drastic.
he Communist proposes confiscation of all private Capital, the Labour Party
leaders propose to buy out the owner of Capital and property. He is to become a
pensioner of the State and will no longer be allowed to use his Capital for private
venture, a proposal more soothing to the Capitalist than the firing line. The
Socialism of our Labour Party is the Bovril of Communism diluted with luke
warm water.
The experiment of running a State on these lines is being tried in
Russia to-day, but it is too early to say whether it can be successfully done and
whether it improves the conditions of the masses of the people.
I do not propose to discuss the merits and demerits of such a system, in which
private enterprise is replaced by a huge bureaucracy, in whatever form it be
disguised. I merely wish to point out that such a system is incompatible with
Democracy, a free Parliament, and freedom of the individual as we understand it.
As we see in
Russia to-day such a system results in political trials and the firing squad. The
Government cannot and dare not allow the slightest divergence in action or
opinion. These political trials are an instructive preliminary to establishing
universal suffrage in Russia, and remind me of the Colonel who shot every tenth
soldier in a regiment "pour encourager les autres".
The Labour Party has failed to convert the majority of the British people to their
economic theory of a State. It is true that by adopting the name the Labour Party,
they have swept into their organization the Trades Unions and rely on them as a
source of income and so create a class party which is supported by a large
minority principally composed of wage earners; but these wage earners are not
necessarily followers of Karl Marx and many, while subscribing through their
union to the party funds, vote for the Conservative Government. The political
issue is therefore confused.
The policy of this country has been and is based on individualism in production
and trade, modified in two
directions, - protection for the wage earner, and when open unregulated barter has
proved inefficient, modification of it by a certain amount of organization and
arrangement of prices by the State.
If we turn now to Germany we find that the Germans have completely and utterly
repudiated Karl Marx Socialism.
The best proof of this is, that they are building their whole economic system on
the peasant proprietor, and doing all they can to conserve and strengthen his
position, thus pursuing the opposite policy to the Soviet which tried to abolish the
peasant proprietor and convert him into the wage slave of the Communist
Government. After a fierce struggle in which millions died of starvation the
Soviet have arrived at a grudging compromise in which the peasant is allowed a
little land and a small modicum of stock of his own.
The German economic experiments are all on our lines. They have carried the
protection of the wage earner much further than we have. They have adopted as
universal the organization that we have established in the railways for settling
disputes about wages. They have improved on our factory inspectors by
appointing state officials who have cognizance of the whole conditions of
labour.
In the other province they are bringing in State regulation of prices when they
think that free competition has been ruinous to the small producer, injurious to
the consumer, and only benefited the middle man with ready Capital at this
command.
There is another interesting point in this connection. The German Government is
building up in trade, in manufacture, in agriculture, organizations of those
engaged in the industry with the minimum of State control, in direct contradiction
to Karl Marx Socialist ideas, and preserving in that way the liberty of the
producer from too much State interference.
They are following and improving the lines we have always followed, basing the
economic State on individual effort.
The result is that their bitterest enemies to-day are the followers of Karl Marx
from Moscow to the T.U.C. They attack and misrepresent the Nazi rule on every
platform and are ready to plunge Europe and this country into war to crush the
economic system adopted by the Nazi Government. As the real issue would not
appeal to the public, they raise a false cry of Democracy in danger, while they
advocate an economic system which would destroy Democracy.
There need be no quarrel about forms of Goverment between us and Germany.
They frankly prefer their own as we frankly prefer ours; but they have no desire to
force their opinion on other nations, while our Labour Party are prepared to go to
extremes to force their opinion on Germany.
A prominent Labour leader said at a "Peace" meeting the other day that he was
willing his son should fight and die to destroy the Nazi rule in Germany.
The aggressive party in Europe to-day is not the Nazi party but the followers of
Karl Marx whether they call themselves Communists or Socialists.
This quarrel therefore between the Nazis and the followers of Karl Marx is
influencing foreign politics and our foreign relations and involving the possibility
of war.
It is therefore necessary for the sober British citizen to regard with suspicion what
he reads in the Press in the journalistic world here and abroad.
It would be the very irony of fate if we were dragged into a war to promote
Communism abroad when we have rejected it at home.
Passing from internal organization to external politics, we find German foreign
policy governed by a revolt against control of the nations by a super State centred
at Geneva so that whether we examine their domestic or foreign policy, we find
the fundamental principle of freedom, freedom of the individual in his own
development, and freedom of the group of individuals (the nation) in its
development. These ideas are fundamental and strike much deeper than the form
of Government.
Behind the Labour Party in this country is the Comintern carrying on Communist
propaganda in every corner of the world. It is therefore necessary for us to
recognise what is the real ideological battle which is going on in Europe. It is the
battle between Communism on the one hand, which means not only the State
ownership of all property, and the crushing of individual enterprise, but the denial
of God and the destruction of Christianity; and the idea, on the other hand, of a
State built on the right of individual enterprise and ownership of private property
which are the foundations on which liberty is built.
The issue has been cleverly falsified by representing the struggle of the two
ideologies as a war between Communism and "Capitalism". If by "Capitalism" we
mean the right to private ownership of property, then the war is rightly described
as being between Communism and "Capitalism," but the word "Capitalism" calls
up a vision of a fat financier smoking cigars at five shillings apiece, as he rides to
the city in his Rolls Royce.
The establishment of Communism and its maintenance necessitates a ruthless
tyranny over the individual. We hear little about Russia from the Labour
Party to-day. It is buried under a black cloud through which comes the rattle of
the shots from the firing squads. If we had been dragged into war over the quarrel
between the Germans and the Czechs we would have fought with Stalin as our
ally, and we have rightly drawn back shuddering from such a catastrophe.
The revolution in Spain began with horrible massacres accompanied by bestial
cruelty in which it is estimated some 400,000 perished, and the ferocity of the
murderers was principally directed against the Church.
Behind the struggle of the Sudeten Germans, the Poles and the Hungarians, for
freedom from Czech rule, the real contest was with Communism. When Benes
made his treaty with Russia it was hailed by the Comintern as a victory for
Communism, and Benes was a favoured guest at Moscow because he had opened
the door for the entry of the Soviet armies into the heart of Europe. The first act
of the new Government
in Czecho-Slovakia, which is as democratic as the former government, has been
to break the treaty with the Soviet and suppress the Communists societies.
Communism has received its severest. blow since the Soviet Government was
defeated by the armies of Poland.
France has oscillated between the policy of friendship with and enmity against
Germany according to whether the parties of the right or the left were in power,
and the Communist party refused to support Daladier in his policy of
reconciliation with Germany, and organized a general strike to prevent the
signing of the Peace Pact, and M. Blum, Communist and leader of the Socialist
party, has declared against the Peace Pact with Germany.
The world struggle is not between democratic and totalitarian, forms of
government, but between the civilization of Western Europe built on individual
liberty of action and the ownership of private property, and a State in which all
are wage slaves who, if they fail in their quota of production are shot. The
shooting of the brilliant inventor who designed the planes which reached the
North Pole, because one of the planes came down, should have filled the civilised
world with horror.
The amiable idealists of our Labour Party think they can get the best of both
worlds with one foot in the Communist camp and the other in the democratic
camp. It cannot be done. It is necessary for the democratic countries to decide on
which side they stand. There need be no quarrel between Democracy and
National Socialism; we both have the task of saving European civilization from
the inroads of Asiatic barbarians inspired by a theory which is fundamentally
opposed to our conception of civilization. The vanguard facing Communistic
Asia is Germany, sword in hand, protecting Europe.
The Case for Germany
A Study of Modern Germany
|